Posts Tagged ‘Shareholder Value’

Ailing Banks Favor Salaries Over Shareholders

by  

No Comments | Share/Save

Published in The New York Times January 27, 2010 by Eric Dash

Finding the winners on Wall Street is usually as simple as looking at pay. Rarely are bankers who lose money paid as generously as those who make it.  But this year is unusual. A handful of big banks that are struggling in the postbailout world are, by some measures, the industry’s most magnanimous employers.

Link to full article

Filed under: Newsfeeds



Wall Street’s Pay Shift Augurs Ill for Stockholders

by  

No Comments | Share/Save

The move by big banks and securities firms to dole out more stock and less cash to employees could help counter political anger about Wall Street’s pay culture. But shareholders likely will likely pay for it for years.

Filed under: Newsfeeds



Shareholders Alone Can’t Correct ‘Too Big to Fail’

by  

No Comments | Share/Save

Published in The Nation November 23, 2009 by Zach Carter

During a House Oversight Committee hearing in October, a rare bipartisan consensus appeared to be building around a strategy to rein in executive compensation.
US banks, shareholders actually want their executives to be rewarded for taking on excessive risk.
“We need to empower the stockholders of public companies to better manage the package of pay and the incentive packages of their key executives,” said Representative Darrell Issa of California, the panel’s ranking Republican.
“Some constraints on these companies are necessary to protect the safety and soundness of the entire financial system,” said committee chair Edolphus Towns, a Democrat from New York. “We need to give the shareholders a way to get this under control.”
But while reinforcing shareholder rights may solve other corporate governance problems plaguing the US economy, like sloppy board oversight and managerial incompetence, shareholders are not going to end the bloated pay practices that have sparked outrage over the past year.

Link to full article

Filed under: Newsfeeds



Goldman Holders Miffed at Bonuses

by  

No Comments | Share/Save

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704533904574545981008841004.html?mod=WSJ_hps_LEFTWhatsNews
NOVEMBER 20, 2009
Goldman Holders Miffed at Bonuses
Some Investors in the Stock Urge ThatMore of the Riches Be Passed Along to Them
By SUSANNE CRAIG
Some of the largest shareholders in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. have urged the Wall Street firm to reduce the size of its bonus pool, arguing that it should pass along more of its blockbuster earnings to investors, according to people familiar with the situation.
The investors hold tens of millions of shares in Goldman Sachs, which is on track to make the biggest employee payout in the firm’s 140-year history.

Published in The Wall Street Journal November 20, 2009 by Susanne Craig

Some of the largest shareholders in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. have urged the Wall Street firm to reduce the size of its bonus pool, arguing that it should pass along more of its blockbuster earnings to investors, according to people familiar with the situation.

The investors hold tens of millions of shares in Goldman Sachs, which is on track to make the biggest employee payout in the firm’s 140-year history.

Link to full article

Filed under: Newsfeeds



Do Corporate Jets Ground Profits?

by  

No Comments | Share/Save

expert perspective telescopeExpert Perspective by Grahall’s OmniMedia Editorial Board

In his October 26, 2009 article for the Wall Street Journal “Curbing Executive Pay, But Not the Perks”  Brett Arends concludes that “a government crackdown on executive compensation may not be the disaster for American capitalism that many fear. However, if [Congress] want to do investors a real favor, they should go after the perks as well as the pay.”

Public uproar over ongoing excesses in executive compensation will surely invoke heightened scrutiny of executive perquisites and retirement plans (see this week’s Grahall The Haves vs. The Have Nots).
Continue reading “Do Corporate Jets Ground Profits?” »

Filed under: Expert Perspective



Does a Superstar CEO Hurt Company Value?

by  

No Comments | Share/Save

Published in Institutional Investor August 5, 2009 by David E. Adler

Overconfident, filled with hubris, set in their ways—this describes the strategic behavior of most CEOs. But there is a special category of CEO, a subspecies if you will: superstar CEOs. These are the CEOs on talk shows and the covers of the business press holding forth on the issue of the day. The ones who appear at the World Economic Forum at Davos. The ones seemingly more worried about global carbon emissions rather than their company’s immediate future. Although it is clear they are concerned global citizens, what is less clear is if they are good for business: How does having a superstar as CEO affect company value?

Link to full article.

Filed under: Newsfeeds



“Say on Pay” a Boon for Advisors, but for Shareholders?

by  

No Comments | Share/Save

Published in The Motley Fool, May 7, 2009 By Liz Peek

…shareholder anger about former excesses, and the demand for say-on-pay, is not likely to disappear.

Link to full article.

Filed under: Newsfeeds



At Annual Meetings, Perks Are Out and Anger Is In

by  

No Comments | Share/Save

Published in The New York Times April 26, 2009 by The Associated Press.

As annual meetings ramp up in earnest for the first time since the economic meltdown, the gatherings are very different affairs. Perks and glitz are out. And, at least in the financial sector, shareholder anger is in.

Filed under: Newsfeeds



Filling the Short Term HR Gap (aka – It’s about Leadership, Stupid!)

by  

No Comments | Share/Save

expert perspective telescopeExpert Perspective by Grahall’s Connie Vogt

In the article “Employees Spending More Time Worrying About Job Security” published by SHRM on March 13, 2009 ,  Theresa Minton-Eversole of SHRM addresses the fact that “With the constant barrage of media attention focused on the economy and the escalating unemployment rates, its no wonder employees – at all levels – are concerned about their careers and their future employment prospects.”

Grahall Commentary:

At a time when employees desperately need guidance and reassurance from their leadership team, it seems they’ve all gone missing (or at least hidden behind closed doors).  To the employee, this signals more bad news is on the horizon and so the informal communications network starts humming about the “what ifs” and productivity takes a nose dive.  To the executive, the closed-door meetings are a necessity to concentrate on solving the crisis quickly.
Continue reading “Filling the Short Term HR Gap (aka – It’s about Leadership, Stupid!)” »

Filed under: Expert Perspective



Commentary on: Firms Using Stock to Help Pension Funds

by  

No Comments | Share/Save

expert perspective telescopeExpert Perspective by Grahall’s Robert Cirkiel

In an article published in Market Watch on December 16, 2008, Christopher Hinton (journalist for Market Watch) addresses the issue of pension plan funding and says: “Some companies think they have a solution though by contributing their own stock to the plan in lieu of cash, particularly if they think the market is undervaluing their shares.”

With the advent of PPA funding rules in 2009, and with pension funding levels very low due to market losses, a number of public companies will fund their pension plan with stock in lieu of cash. This is a double-edged sword.   For example, the article points out that the plan potentially can gain tremendous influence over the company. Also, the plan now has more at risk since pension distributions tend to be counter-cyclical to company performance (since staff terminations and retirements increase in those times.) Said another way, when the plan most needs money, it will have the least. Email Robert Cirkiel at robert.cirkiel@grahall.com

Filed under: Expert Perspective