Posts Tagged ‘Executive compensation’

Fixing Executive Compensation: It’s Not a Simple Job

by Garry Rogers 

No Comments | Share/Save

Expert Perspective by Grahall’s OmniMedia Editorial Board

In his article for the Huffington Post (Wall Street CEO Pay Problems Worsened By New Regulations, Report Says) William Alden writes that “…one of the primary forces encouraging greater risk [and setting off the ‘Great Recession’] was the way that executives at major banks were compensated: Aggressive moves that made stock prices soar in the short-term triggered hefty bonuses, and even when those same moves led to longer-term disasters, the chieftains got to keep the money, leaving taxpayers on the hook for the losses.  A new regulatory framework and much talk of lessons learned was supposed to have changed all that, putting the fortunes of the bank chiefs on the line, and tying their pay to the longer-term health of their companies.”

Alden refers to a report  issued by the Council of Institutional Investors, an association of public and private pension funds (Wall Street Pay) which suggests that the new regulations have done little to reduce risk since the changes simply result in companies increasing stock payouts in lieu of cash bonuses.  The “…council report concludes that simply focusing on boosting stock as a percentage of overall compensation inadequately protects against excessive risk-taking by banking executives.”

We agree, sort of. 
Continue reading “Fixing Executive Compensation: It’s Not a Simple Job” »

Filed under: Expert Perspective - Rewards



Making Lemonade out of Lemons: Occidental Changes its Exec Compensation Plan

by Garry Rogers 

No Comments | Share/Save

Expert Perspective by Grahall’s OmniMedia Editorial Board

The Editorial Board read with interest the October 29, 2010 Edgar-Online article Occidental Petroleum tweaks executive compensation policy that indicated that “The company plans to use more long-term incentives to compensate its top executives. Specifically, it will rely on so-called Total Shareholder Return (TSR) Incentives, which grant bonuses to executives based on how Occidental’s stock performs relative to those of 12 peer companies.”

A little background – Occidental’s top executives (in particular Messrs. Irani and Chazen) have long been among the highest paid executives in their industry, if not in the world.  Critics have argued its rewards programs have dramatically overcompensated Mr. Irani in particular.
Continue reading “Making Lemonade out of Lemons: Occidental Changes its Exec Compensation Plan” »

Filed under: Expert Perspective - Rewards



Citi’s Board Thinks Their CEO Deserves More Compensation

by Garry Rogers 

No Comments | Share/Save

Expert Perspective by Grahall’s OmniMedia Editorial Board

The decision of Citi’s Board in 2011 to  “…compensate Vikram commensurate with the job of CEO of Citi” left our Editorial Board wondering if the Board is intent on communicating a “back to business as usual” message to shareholders and regulators.   According to Matthias Rieker September 20, 2010 article in the Wall Street Journal  (Citi Chairman Intends To Revive CEO’s Pay In 2011) “Pandit had pledged last year to accept only $1 in salary and bonus until Citi returns to profitability. Citi reported a profit for the first and second quarter this year, but Pandit still declined compensation above $1 for this year…”

But Pandit’s commitment to Citi seems not to be shared by his fellow executives, many of whom, we imagine, were involved in decisions that led to the decline of Citi’s stock from well over $50 per share in 2007 to its low of $1.03 in March 2009. 
Continue reading “Citi’s Board Thinks Their CEO Deserves More Compensation” »

Filed under: Expert Perspective - Rewards



Rail Against the Chief

by Michael Dennis Graham 

No Comments | Share/Save

Expert Perspective from Grahall’s OmniMedia Editorial Board

Executive compensation and what is seen as near gluttonous bonus payments during a time when the average American is more likely hurting than not has been a recurring theme in the media.  The Institute for Policy Research has completed its 2009 study of CEO pay titled CEO Pay and the Great Recession that compares for those companies that are the top “layoffs leaders” for the 17 month period, November 1, 2008 to April 1 2010, with the total compensation paid to each CEO for the year 2009.

There are a couple things that aren’t well articulated in either the report or the article covering it by Roland Jones for msnbc.com (CEOs lay off thousands, rake in millions) by Roland Jones.
Continue reading “Rail Against the Chief” »

Filed under: Expert Perspective - Rewards



It’s Not Easy to Make Executive Compensation Truly Effective

by Michael Dennis Graham 

No Comments | Share/Save

Expert Perspective by Grahall’s OmniMedia Editorial Board

In his article for Business Week How to Handle CEO Pay Before Dodd-Frank Hits Bill George subtitles his article “Financial reform will bring unintended effects.” And then goes on to outline “six policies that should be rigorously followed, including in bad times when boards are more prone to bend the rules for those in their top ranks.” On the surface, George’s ideas seems reasonable but lets dive down a bit deeper into them and see what the unintended consequences might be of these directives.
Continue reading “It’s Not Easy to Make Executive Compensation Truly Effective” »

Filed under: Expert Perspective - Rewards



It’s Not Hurd on the Street Any Longer

by Garry Rogers 

1 Comment | Share/Save

Expert Perspective By Grahall’s OmniMedia Editorial Board

Not surprisingly, plenty of media attention was focused on the fact that Mark Hurd, once CEO of H-P, didn’t last long in the unemployment line.  Hurd has landed himself a new position as Co-President of Oracle, sharing the job with Safra Catz and reporting to CEO Larry Ellison.   Three articles published in the Wall Street Journal on this subject particularly caught the attention of the Grahall Editorial Board.  Ben Worthen and Joann S. Lublin write (in their article At Oracle, Hurd Lands in Rare Situation: Having a Boss for First Time in Years Means the Former Hewlett-Packard Chief’s Relationship With CEO Ellison is Crucial): “How Messrs. Hurd and Ellison click is crucial as Oracle tries to expand beyond its core business of selling software and takes on tech conglomerates… in hardware…. So far, the outlook appears positive, said people who have worked with the executives. Messrs. Hurd and Ellison are friends. And while the two have very different management styles, those styles seem compatible, said these people.”

That’s good, since cooperation at the top of the food chain in any organization is critical for the company to quickly and effectively embrace opportunities and resolve issues.  In fact, some companies find that cooperation and coordination in these roles is so important that the CEO and President are in fact the same person.  For companies who separate these roles, the President position is often looked at as a grooming spot for the future CEO. 
Continue reading “It’s Not Hurd on the Street Any Longer” »

Filed under: Expert Perspective - Rewards



“Cleanliness is next to Fordliness.” – Aldous Huxley, Brave New World

by Michael Dennis Graham 

No Comments | Share/Save

Expert Perspective by Grahall’s OmniMedia Editorial Board

Being the top paid CEO in the automobile industry might not be much to crow about in our world of TARP bailouts and Japanese dominance, but for Ford CEO Alan Mulally, his take home pay is significantly greater than his U.S. and Japanese counterparts.  A  June 29th article for Auto in the News titled Ford CEO Mulally Gets Paid More Than Top Three Japanese Execs Combined  tells us that: “As the only Big Three automaker that didn’t get a bailout and fall into bankruptcy… [Ford’s CEO] Mulally has been an integral part of the Blue Oval’s ongoing turnaround, and as a result his efforts are reflected in his salary.  In 2009, Mulally reportedly earned $17.9 million in cash and bonuses. This officially makes him the world’s top-paid auto chief.”

Perhaps these seemingly huge paychecks are part of our national culture of “rock stars” where entertainers, athletes and, maybe even CEOs are paid because they are the product.  No question that a company’s CEO isn’t your average “Joe”, and it is clear that Mulally is, if not “the product” per se, he has become at least a hero of sorts for the Ford Motor Company.
Continue reading ““Cleanliness is next to Fordliness.” – Aldous Huxley, Brave New World” »

Filed under: Expert Perspective - Rewards



The New CSI: Compensation Strategy Investigation

by Michael Dennis Graham 

No Comments | Share/Save

Expert Perspective by Grahall’s OmniMedia Editorial Board

Eric Dash writes in his June 8, 2010 article for the New York Times: (Fed Finding Status Quo in Bank Pay)
“…many of the bonus and incentive programs that economists say contributed to the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression remain in place… In many cases, risk managers do not have full access to the compensation committee of the banks’ boards.

No question that these large banks are complex environments.  In fact that complexity may well have contributed to the “the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression” as Dash described it.   Where there are complex environments, it makes the most sense to bring all the specialists together to examine and analyze circumstances and determine where problems might exist or arise.
Continue reading “The New CSI: Compensation Strategy Investigation” »

Filed under: Expert Perspective - Rewards



Say, say, say on pay: Doing more harm than good?

by Garry Rogers 

1 Comment | Share/Save

Expert Perspective from Grahall’s OmniMedia Editorial Board
 
As Eleanor Bloxham writes in her May 25, 2010 article published in CNN Money.com (Say on Pay: 4 ways to defend executive pay under the new law): “The new finance reform bill is set to become law and say on pay, an advisory vote on compensation for shareholders, is a centerpiece of the reform. Few boards and companies, or investors, are ready for what that means…  with “say on pay”, the stakes have been raised for boards to explain in clear, credible English why the pay packages they propose should be adopted.”

Bloxham endorses say on pay:  “Companies… have offered “kitchen sink” defenses, as to why their pay plans are too different, too specialized, too standardized or too complicated for shareholders to properly understand and evaluate. But Congress has totally upended the board-shareholder power structure: companies are going to have to defend their own words and statements to shareholders this year, at the risk of eating them. So, let the votes begin.”

Grahall has written many blogs on say on pay.  Last December we wrote in our blog It’s Not an Easy Fix that “It is possible that ‘say on pay’ votes, even though non-binding,  could become the equivalent of a ‘bleeding edge’ endorsement or indictment of Board governance and fiduciary duty, effectively becoming  binding in their application and ability to control executive pay.   Boards with ‘yes’ votes get a ‘rubber stamp’ on their decision and Boards with ‘no’ votes could possibly risk civil suits if they take no action.  In the end, making ‘say on pay’ a defacto binding  vote, transfers these decisions from an informed group (i.e., the Board) who (we would hope) has made decisions based on solid data, business strategy and sound philosophy to an uniformed group (i.e., shareholders) who made decisions based on imperfect data or a gut reaction.”

Essentially if one believes in the merits of our corporate governance system, then say on pay should not be needed, since the board should be able to do a better, more informed job than the populace. 
Continue reading “Say, say, say on pay: Doing more harm than good?” »

Filed under: Expert Perspective - Rewards



Money, Mix and Messages

by Robert Cirkiel 

No Comments | Share/Save

“With all this talk about no hitters, when Harvey Haddix was a Pirate and pitched a 12 inning perfect game, they gave him a car.  Shouldn’t they have given him a boat?”

Filed under: In 10 Words ... More or Less