Posts Tagged ‘Board of Directors’

They Work Hard for the Money

by Edie Kingston 

1 Comment | Share/Save

Expert Perspective by Grahall’s OmniMedia Editorial Board

expert perspective telescopeIn an August 7, 2009 Cnet News article titled “Google ups director compensation awards” author Tom Krazit says: “in a filing with the SEC Friday, Google revealed that it will be breaking with tradition by deciding to pay directors not employed by the company $75,000 a year in cash and $350,000 a year in restricted stock grants.”

From its infancy in 1998 through its rise to the top of the Internet search engine food chain, the company has changed drastically; Google’s business strategy has evolved as its meteoric stock price growth has slowed.  Both these changes should have – and apparently did – engender a change to the Board compensation.
Continue reading “They Work Hard for the Money” »

Filed under: Expert Perspective



Google ups director compensation awards

by News Monitor 

No Comments | Share/Save

Published in cnetnews.com August 7, 2009 by Tom Krazit

Google plans to start paying non-employee directors on its board in cash, just after tossing them a hefty restricted stock award.

Link to full article.

Filed under: Newsfeeds



Shareholder Lawsuits Won’t Rebalance the Boardroom

by Edie Kingston 

2 Comments | Share/Save

expert perspective telescopeExpert Perspective from Grahall’s OmniMedia Editorial Board

An article by Sara Hansard published in Investment News June 2, 2009 discusses House subcommittee chairman Democrat Paul Kanjorski’s recommendation that “Shareholders should have more power to bring lawsuits against companies for paying excessive compensation to executives.”

While we agree that shareholder lawsuits might “get attention of boards and managers,” we do not believe that lawsuits will help restore individual shareholders to the “power coalition” in corporate America. 
Over the past few decades the ownership structure of public companies has changed dramatically. Where individual shareholders once had substantial ownership – and therefore a voice in the boardrooms of public companies – that ownership position has become highly diluted.  Today the tilt in the power coalition greatly favors management because management selects board candidates  and determines the issues put before the boards. 

Individual shareholders today have dwindling influence, and we don’t think that will change with more latitude to bring lawsuits, with “non-binding” say on pay, or with building “better democratic principles into corporations” (whatever Rep Kanjorski meant by that). Ok, maybe Warren Buffett or Carl Ichan can buy sufficient shares (sometimes all of them) to demand a place on the board – or for that matter become management – and penetrate the corporate power coalition.  Most individuals can’t. 

Some might hope that institutional shareholders – pension funds, mutual finds, endowments and the like – who own substantial shares will help to influence management decisions. But research shows that institutional shareholders vote with management more often than not, in fact as much as 90% of the time.    

Legislating additional leverage for shareholders by giving them “more power to bring lawsuits” is a principled idea assuming it is an attempt to level the playing field. But it does not go to the core of the problem, which is the current corporate compensation paradigm: imperial CEOs, with chartered boards and compensation advisors whose independence may be compromised. 

Email OmniMedia’s Editor at edie.kingston@grahall.com

Filed under: Expert Perspective



Management, Boards and Comp Consultants: A Change of Heart?

by Edie Kingston 

2 Comments | Share/Save

expert perspective telescopeExpert Perspective by Grahall’s OmniMedia Editor

I was fascinated to see the Eliot Spitzer (yes THAT Eliot Spitzer) had an article published in Slate.com but was even more interested to see that the subject was the apparent change of heart of one of the most prominently conservative federal judges, Richard Posner. Spitzer notes that “[Posner] is both the creator and the defender of the free-market theory that has guided deregulation for the past 30 years.” Further Spitzer notes that in a dissenting opinion, “Posner wrote that there is growing indications that CEO pay ‘is excessive because of the feeble incentives of the board of directors to police compensation…’”. Wow that is pretty left wing for Posner.
Continue reading “Management, Boards and Comp Consultants: A Change of Heart?” »

Filed under: Expert Perspective



Elect a Dissident, and You May Win a Prize

by News Monitor 

No Comments | Share/Save

Published in The New York Times May 24, 2009 by Gretchen Morgenson

After decades of being shut out of the director election process by the Securities and Exchange Commission, shareholders scored a big win last week. The agency is considering making it easier for investors to nominate alternative directors to corporate boards.
 

Link to full article.

Filed under: Newsfeeds



A Quiet Response to ‘Say on Pay’ Measures

by News Monitor 

No Comments | Share/Save

Published in The Wall Street Journal May 18, 2009 by Joann S. Lubin

Investor anger over executive pay and management missteps isn’t showing up at the corporate ballot box.  In the current proxy-voting season, management-compensation policies are winning large support and shareholders have ousted only a handful of corporate directors.

Link to full article.

Read Grahall’s Expert Perspective on this subject.

Filed under: Newsfeeds



The executive pay system is broken

by News Monitor 

No Comments | Share/Save

Published in Market Watch May 12, 2009 by Alistair Barr and Matt Andrejczak.

Compensation — especially for the highest paid — has been controversial for almost a century. But after a year in which Wall Street firms paid $18.4 billion in bonuses while accepting more than $50 billion in government bailouts, many experts say the system may have finally blown itself apart.

Link to full article.

Filed under: Newsfeeds



In Defense of Director Pay

by News Monitor 

No Comments | Share/Save

Published in The Wall Street Journal May 4, 2009 by George Davis, Partner at Egon Zehnder International, an executive search firm.

As annual meeting season approaches – amid the continued outrage over executive compensation — another group now finds itself under scrutiny for its pay: Boards of directors.

Link to full article.

Filed under: Newsfeeds



Have your say on CEO pay

by News Monitor 

No Comments | Share/Save

Published in the Christian Science Monitor April 16, 2009 by G. Jeffrey MacDonald

More than 100 companies face resolutions at their annual meeting this spring that would give shareholders a chance to vote on executives’ pay packages. These “say on pay” votes would be nonbinding. But with the public and Congress livid about bonuses paid to executives at AIG and other government-supported companies, boards of directors would do well to pay attention, shareholder activists say.

Link to full article

Filed under: Newsfeeds



‘Say on Pay’ and Other Bad Ideas

by News Monitor 

No Comments | Share/Save

Published in the Wall Street Journal on April 13, 2009 by Jonathan Macey

To socialize the American economy, it is not necessary to nationalize every business in the United States. All it requires is to put the corporations that control the finances of all of the companies in the economy under government control. And that is what is happening now.

Link to full article

Filed under: Newsfeeds