Archive for March, 2010

Progress in our world will be progress toward more pain. George Orwell “1984”

by Edie Kingston 

No Comments | Share/Save

Ask the Expert: Robert Cirkiel

Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Paul Ingrassia and Staff Writer Imogen Rose-Smith wrote a disturbing account of the potential  risk to the country’s pension system in a lengthy article for institutional investor titled  “Trillion-Dollar Pension Crisis Looms Large Over America“ . The authors say: “As the U.S. slowly pulls itself out of recession following the worst financial debacle in more than 70 years, another potential crisis is looming on the horizon. The country’s pension system — both public and private plans — faces trillions of dollars in unfunded liabilities and has little hope of ever being able to meet them.”

We asked Grahall’s Robert Cirkiel for his take on this. 

This is generally acknowledged to be an issue, but more so for the public sector.  In fact, the unfunded liability for Social Security alone is $17.5 Trillion.  Together with Medicare, the unfunded liability is anywhere between $53 Trillion and $107 Trillion depending who you ask.  This is all off-balance otherwise US debt would be rated as junk.  It is junk but it’s just not rated this way. 

Private sector pensions have been underfunded for a while too but not as severely and besides, private sector pensions are not all that prevalent anymore.  Back in 2006, the Pension Protection Act was enacted requiring all private pension plans to be adequately funded within seven years.  That was when the market was GOOD!  A crash wasn’t even anticipated in the Act’s language.  If you follow the news, private pension plans one-by-one are going the way of the dodo bird.  They either terminate, freeze, or are taken over by the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation, the pension version of the FDIC.   This movement away from defined benefit pension plans is logical.  Companies cannot allow their pension plan liability to bankrupt them.  (Consider this another example of the “efficient economy”.) But at least these private pension plans are insured. 

The public sector has always relied on “the unbridled taxing authority” of the sponsor.  In fact, the taxing authority has always been the counter argument to the existing of a funding crisis in that it implies that there is no need to prepay the unfunded liability and that like Social Security, the funding need not be more rapid than “pay-as-you-go.” 

For more on Grahall’s and Robert Cirkiel’s perspective on the pension landscape the relationship between retirement savings and workforce strategies and how to fix the problems read:

• The Haves vs. The Have Not 
• What It Really Means to Have Only a 401(k) Plan for Your Retirement
• 401k Plans are Easy to Fix: Use A Hammer 
• From Here to Eternity 
• It’s Complicated 

Contact Robert Cirkiel at robert.cirkiel@grahall.com

Filed under: Ask the Expert



A Closer Look at Berkshire’s Executive Compensation Policy

by News Monitor 

No Comments | Share/Save

Published in The Motley Fool March 12, 2010 By Ravi Nagarajan 

Berkshire Hathaway’s 2010 Proxy Statement was released yesterday and much attention has been devoted to the low compensation provided to Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger.  Mr. Buffett’s total compensation remained at $175,000 which included $100,000 of salary and $75,000 in director’s fees from the Washington Post.

Link to full article

Filed under: Newsfeeds



Efforts to reform how bosses’ salaries are set are unlikely to work

by News Monitor 

No Comments | Share/Save


Spring is in the air, bringing with it angry thoughts about executive pay. This year the economic downturn is adding extra emotion to the season’s familiar fury. Unions are, for example, outraged at the $21m paid in 2009 to Sam Palmisano, IBM’s boss, not least because his firm laid off 10,000 workers in America last year.

Link to full article

Filed under: Newsfeeds



Trillion-Dollar Pension Crisis Looms Large Over America

by News Monitor 

No Comments | Share/Save

The country’s pension system — both public and private plans — faces trillions of dollars in unfunded liabilities. This special report examines what General Motor’s historic bankruptcy has to teach about the looming pension crisis, while pointing to alarming parallels between GM and cash-strapped California, whose pension crisis may already have arrived.

Link to full article

Filed under: Newsfeeds



AIG’s Rankings Will Weigh on Pay

by News Monitor 

No Comments | Share/Save

American International Group Inc. is basing its upcoming round of bonuses and incentive pay on its new “forced ranking” system that measures the performances of about 10,000 employees, according to people familiar with the matter.

Filed under: Newsfeeds



Those Who Can, DO!

by Garry Rogers 

No Comments | Share/Save

Expert Perspective by Grahall’s OmniMedia Editorial Board
 
Recently, The Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University’s Camelia Kuhnen addressed several pressing issues in executive compensation.  Grahall’s editorial Board thought it would be interesting to canvas our team of Top Consultants to provide our thoughts in addressing the same questions posed by Bloomberg BusinessWeek.com’s Patricia O’Connell on the subject of “Executive Compensation and Public Outrage” (Business Week February 24, 2009). 

The questions below have been selected from O’Connell’s interview with Ms. Kuhnen, but the answers are from Grahall consultants with a total of combined experience of more than 200 years designing executive compensation programs for literally thousands of public and private U.S. companies in various stages of development. 

Q – “What do you think about the state of exec comp? It was a big issue a year ago, and people were expecting a lot of reform.”

In our authoritative research of top named officers in 1,000 public companies there is a significant correlation of pay to the size of the company and to performance measured over seven different variables in 95% of companies. This strongly suggests what we’ve long suspected – that typically, executive compensation programs are generally very effective and appropriately linked to financial performance.
Continue reading “Those Who Can, DO!” »

Filed under: Expert Perspective



Health care spending – use it, don’t abuse it

by Garry Rogers 

No Comments | Share/Save

Expert Perspective by Grahall’s OmniMedia Editorial Board

As the heath care debate continues so does the press coverage.  Reed Abelson says in his February 26th 2009 article in The New York Times (“The Cost of Doing Nothing on Health Care”) “…health policy analysts and economists of nearly every ideological persuasion agree [that without health care reform] …The unrelenting rise in medical costs is likely to wreak havoc within the system and beyond it, and pretty much everyone will be affected, directly or indirectly.”

The cost of health care is high and going higher without reform.
Continue reading “Health care spending – use it, don’t abuse it” »

Filed under: Expert Perspective



For CEO Pay, a Single Number Never Tells the Whole Story

by News Monitor 

No Comments | Share/Save

Eli Lilly & Co. Chief Executive John Lechleiter received compensation of $20.9 million last year, up 45% from a year earlier, according to the formula the drug maker was required to use in its proxy statement. But Lilly thinks it is fairer to value the CEO’s pay at $15.9 million, up 10%. Executive pay is a hot topic, but the players can’t agree how to keep score.

Link to full article

Filed under: Newsfeeds



Companies’ Claws May Have Limited Reach

by News Monitor 

No Comments | Share/Save


Although more companies are insisting on clawback provisions in executives’ contracts, their effectiveness as a tool to recoup bonuses and other compensation when things go bad remains to be seen. Some critics view them as legally questionable and point to, among other obstacles, conflicts with state wage laws that could be used to stymie a company’s attempt to reclaim pay.

Filed under: Newsfeeds



Criticism of Executive Pay Rules Is Just ‘Spin’: Pay Czar

by News Monitor 

No Comments | Share/Save


Pay czar Kenneth Feinberg disputed claims that limiting executive pay will push companies’ top talent to firms that have no restrictions on compensation, telling CNBC he’s seen no hard evidence of this phenomenon.
Similarly, he said that regulating pay has had no negative effect on states’ tax revenues, calling both arguments a form of “spin.”

Link to full article

Filed under: Newsfeeds